<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Upgraded to Wordpress 2.2</title>
	<link>http://eightflat.org/tracesofmartinsstate/2007/05/18/upgraded-to-wordpress-22/</link>
	<description>Entangled?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://eightflat.org/tracesofmartinsstate/2007/05/18/upgraded-to-wordpress-22/#comment-90990</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 06:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eightflat.org/tracesofmartinsstate/2007/05/18/upgraded-to-wordpress-22/#comment-90990</guid>
		<description>I just installed &lt;a href="http://recaptcha.net/learnmore.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;reCAPTCHA&lt;/a&gt;. I had to hack it a little to make it generate valid html. This is a test comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just installed <a href="http://recaptcha.net/learnmore.html" rel="nofollow">reCAPTCHA</a>. I had to hack it a little to make it generate valid html. This is a test comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://eightflat.org/tracesofmartinsstate/2007/05/18/upgraded-to-wordpress-22/#comment-77229</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 09:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eightflat.org/tracesofmartinsstate/2007/05/18/upgraded-to-wordpress-22/#comment-77229</guid>
		<description>Wow, I think &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/15522" rel="nofollow"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; is the way to do it: using the Internet to correct OCR mistakes. It's a win-win. Wonder if it is available for Wordpress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I think <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/15522" rel="nofollow">this</a> is the way to do it: using the Internet to correct OCR mistakes. It&#8217;s a win-win. Wonder if it is available for Wordpress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://eightflat.org/tracesofmartinsstate/2007/05/18/upgraded-to-wordpress-22/#comment-75245</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 19:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eightflat.org/tracesofmartinsstate/2007/05/18/upgraded-to-wordpress-22/#comment-75245</guid>
		<description>HAL 9000: I totally agree! But it was a really cheap way of getting rid of spam (for now), as I just used a free plugin for Wordpress. 

Using humans to teach spam bots how to answer these questions is really smart. Maybe we could make a noise bot, that will fool the porn based harvesters? Hm, it's a war out there - but I still very much prefer to manually kill some spam comments now and then, instead of having to pay some extra Internet tax.

Anyway - I might hack the plugin and remove that stupid "This confirms...". :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAL 9000: I totally agree! But it was a really cheap way of getting rid of spam (for now), as I just used a free plugin for Wordpress. </p>
<p>Using humans to teach spam bots how to answer these questions is really smart. Maybe we could make a noise bot, that will fool the porn based harvesters? Hm, it&#8217;s a war out there - but I still very much prefer to manually kill some spam comments now and then, instead of having to pay some extra Internet tax.</p>
<p>Anyway - I might hack the plugin and remove that stupid &#8220;This confirms&#8230;&#8221;. <img src='http://eightflat.org/tracesofmartinsstate/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HAL 9000</title>
		<link>http://eightflat.org/tracesofmartinsstate/2007/05/18/upgraded-to-wordpress-22/#comment-75203</link>
		<dc:creator>HAL 9000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 17:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eightflat.org/tracesofmartinsstate/2007/05/18/upgraded-to-wordpress-22/#comment-75203</guid>
		<description>But Martin?! Answering the stupid question when leaving a comment doesn't really confirm with 100% certainty that the comment was posted by a human user.

Not only because designing a good Turing test is very difficult, nor because there may be some overlap between what a human can do, and what a computer can do (that's certainly true for humans and bears, see http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/08/security_is_a_t.html ), but also because spammers are getting around these tests by harvesting a practically-free resource on the Internet: the desire to see pornography: http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000189,39153933,00.htm

I think you should change the phrase "This confirms you are a human user!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Martin?! Answering the stupid question when leaving a comment doesn&#8217;t really confirm with 100% certainty that the comment was posted by a human user.</p>
<p>Not only because designing a good Turing test is very difficult, nor because there may be some overlap between what a human can do, and what a computer can do (that&#8217;s certainly true for humans and bears, see <a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/08/security_is_a_t.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/08/security_is_a_t.html</a> ), but also because spammers are getting around these tests by harvesting a practically-free resource on the Internet: the desire to see pornography: <a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000189,39153933,00.htm" rel="nofollow">http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000189,39153933,00.htm</a></p>
<p>I think you should change the phrase &#8220;This confirms you are a human user!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
